Exynos 2200

[LMay]

I'm hearing some disappointing news regarding the Exynos powered S22 Ultra. Why do Samsung have the strategy of giving the rest of the world Exynos and America and other countries Snapdragon?. Hearing some negative feedback about the Exynos version and the benchmarks were way down compared to Snapdragon.......WTF happened🤔

[Kartex]

What happened? Well... I won't be buying their trash exynos in UK that's for sure.

[BandOfBrothers]

Hi @LMay 

There are some existing threads on the forum in regards to the use of Exynos and SnapDragon SoC that discuss the reasons for use in different regions.

Personally I've owned both SnapDragon and Exynos versions of Samsung phone's whether they've been officially released in the UK i.e my Fold³ or imported one i.e the Samsung Note 20 Ultra from Hong Kong. I owned the Exynos model of the same phone too bought from Samsung UK.

The SnapDragon version was better optimised as it typically gave around 45 minutes to 1 hour more battery.

Apart from that both felt the same during normal usage.

There are lots of Tech articles and YouTube first impressions about the Samsung Galaxy s²² Series of phone's in regards to tbe two types of SoC and my opinion is to take from them what you will but try not to get too caught up in them.

Geekbench and other types of benchmarks look lovely on paper but don't reflect true user experience.

This is my personal opinion.

I own the Samsung Galaxy s²² Ultra and from my own set up, apps i use,  personal preference and settings set up, and my usage patterns this phone hasn't disappointed me yet.

If it did it would be sent back to Samsung within the 21 day returns period.

[andykod77]

It's something samsung have been doing for years now, it's just the way it is ,personally I have no quarrels with it exynos is the version we get here in the UK and I'm happy with it ,if its that big of a factor for you I'd just go with something else that has your preferred snapdragon chip .

[Kartex]

You either stupid people or work for Samsung. What you essentially are saying is that it's fine to pay £1500 for a lagging phones filled with bugs because later on Samsung will send updates. You buying a product now ..and paying for it now...so Scamsung must have their end product in order. This ain't £350 Phone..but £1500 and my brain can't comprehend how can they release not finished product on the market. Hope people return their exynos variants or not buy at all. It's the consumers world! I have Note 9..and it still rocking...their best phone ever but this....omg...lags, bugs, screen issues...Batyery issues, amd graphics yet you can't play pubg on full settings wtf....what a scam for your hard earned money....my secondary phone is old £300 reame that is doing much better job than exynos

[LMay]

I thought Samsung would've ironed out those issues before release. Usually Samsung phones get like that after 12-18 months, not straight out the box.

[-Robot-]

I have had no issue with my s22 Ultra, no lagging, dodgy screen or buggy usage at all

So don't understand why alot of people who don't actually have the s22 is bitching about it

So youre complaining about the potential buggy, lagging and dodgy screen if you had one? Which you don't

I am not a Samsung employee or stupid, thanks for your potential concern

[Kartex]

Ro-BOT...your name says it all, tnx