A different perspective on the Recycle Bin: Could it be about hardware longevity?
While the frustration about the removed choice is completely valid, I've been thinking about the possible technical reasons behind this forced implementation. We all know about the global semiconductor crunch and the strain on production lines. At the same time, NAND flash memory has a finite number of write/erase cycles.
What if Samsung's decision is a strategic move to reduce the wear and tear on the memory controller and storage chips? By using the Recycle Bin as a buffer, the system performs fewer immediate, permanent erase operations. This "delayed deletion" smooths out the workflow for the memory controller, potentially increasing its lifespan and reducing the risk of premature failure. In an era of supply chain constraints and a push for longer device longevity, minimizing warranty claims and ensuring device reliability over years could be a powerful, albeit unspoken, motivator.
This doesn't excuse the removal of user choice. A better solution would be to keep the feature but clearly explain this trade-off: "Disabling the bin may increase storage wear." This way, Samsung could achieve its reliability goals while still respecting the power users who understand and accept the risks.
