Vivid and natural do not look exactly the same. There is a difference but it is far less pronounced as has been on previous Samsung devices. To me natural makes the screen slightly green tinted.
To my eyes they look exactly the same. But even if you say the difference is less pronounced. Doesn't that defeat the whole purpose of having two different options. If I'm choosing vivid. I am expecting VIVID. If I'm choosing NATURAL then I am expecting toned down colours and natural looking.
Ive seen several posts on this and alot of people are coming from previous models where colours were actually VIVID not this less pronounced subtle colour change.
There's no difference on my phone and I have perfect vision. There may be one on other people's phones but I'm getting rather annoyed at folk telling me what me own eyes can and can't see.
You won't see it on a screenshot comparison, the display information will be identical. When you select vivid or natural, that changes the display output, not the image being displayed.
Doesn't look identical to me now when I manually adjusted the colours.. Which means the fact you are using the screenshot excuse just shows you cannot see a difference. Which was my point exactly
It's not an excuse, it's a basic fact. You changing the image saturation is why you will see a difference which will happen no matter which mode you choose.
