27-02-2018 10:24 AM
Seen this article just now https://www.ispreview.co.uk/index.php/2018/02/sky-uk-unveils-next-wave-sky-q-tv-feature-upgrades.htm... and it will be very interesting to see if our televisions get HDR content through Sky Q.
Not seen anything yet about the format but assuming its HLG.
Will keep this thread as up to date as I can.
25-04-2018 10:32 AM
25-04-2018 12:09 PM
@gfsracing wrote:
Just seen this on another forum
http://www.avsforum.com/forum/166-lcd-flat-panel-displays/2387466-official-samsung-ks8000-ks8500-own...
Certainly hopeful news and thanks for the link.
25-04-2018 12:26 PM
The fact that we seem to be getting this information from multiple sources hopefully comfirms that Samsung are looking at this problem
25-04-2018 01:08 PM
@gfsracing wrote:The fact that we seem to be getting this information from multiple sources hopefully comfirms that Samsung are looking at this problem
It's a pity though Samsung will not officially confirm or deny this.
25-04-2018 01:33 PM
Definitely! Let's just hope the fix is out before Sky actually launch HDR!
I still don't understand why Samsung added HLG to these tv's over a year ago but never bothered to update the EDID at the same time?
25-04-2018 02:03 PM
@jordanwebbo90 wrote:Definitely! Let's just hope the fix is out before Sky actually launch HDR!
I still don't understand why Samsung added HLG to these tv's over a year ago but never bothered to update the EDID at the same time?
I agree!!
However, it may well be because adding HLG to the EDID may not have been 'necessary' in their products. HLG is supposed to be Backwards Compatible and work on any TV whether it supports HLG or not. The content could be sent regardless of whether its to a HLG enabled TV or not and will still display. Samsungs own Bluray players for example don't require an EDID update to work so they 'may' have thought that was unnecessary. It has proved to be a mistake now with DirectTV and now Sky requesting that information from the EDID before they will send HLG to the TV.
In my opinion, it would have made sense to ensure the EDID was updated along with the HLG update to cover all eventualities. It seems odd to me that they didn't update the EDID along with the update that adds a 'new' spec to the TV. It almost feels like a rushed or half-assed update where one of the important factors of it was overlooked - the one that tells connected devices that it can send HLG content because the TV is HLG enabled.
25-04-2018 02:09 PM
@jordanwebbo90 wrote:Definitely! Let's just hope the fix is out before Sky actually launch HDR!
I still don't understand why Samsung added HLG to these tv's over a year ago but never bothered to update the EDID at the same time?
Like many things to do with the company, it's very odd. Their refusal to supply any release notes* with firmware upgrades is a fundamental part of the problem and makes it much harder to trace problems and dates.
Just compare it with THIS from Sony: https://www.sony.co.uk/electronics/support/downloads/00015010 . This is the level of information that anyone would expect to be provided with any firmware update:
===============BEGIN QUOTE===============
===============END QUOTE=================
I won't be able to change Samsung's mind with this post, but I hope one day they recognise the benefits of transparancy for both their customers and their business as a whole.
* Samsung's boilerplate text ("Improved usability, Improved browser performance, Improved app performance, Improved stability, Improved usability of input devices.") which is tagged onto to every single firmware upgrade is actually worse than nothing, because it's merely a "we've made it better" platitude, and lulls some people into thinking they have been given release notes.
25-04-2018 02:25 PM
It seems that way, or at the time they only added HLG with the intention of it working with the internal tuners.
Which seems likely as when discussing the iplayer issue they always state HLG for BROADCAST was added to the TV as promised, and won't be made compatible through iplayer.
25-04-2018 04:00 PM
@jordanwebbo90 wrote:It seems that way, or at the time they only added HLG with the intention of it working with the internal tuners.
Which seems likely as when discussing the iplayer issue they always state HLG for BROADCAST was added to the TV as promised, and won't be made compatible through iplayer.
I know its a play on words but would the live rugby shown on Saturday on Iplayer 4K HLG be broadcast as it's live, bit like the world cup if that's also shown on Iplayer?
25-04-2018 06:14 PM - last edited 25-04-2018 06:18 PM
@paul1111 wrote:
@jordanwebbo90 wrote:It seems that way, or at the time they only added HLG with the intention of it working with the internal tuners.
Which seems likely as when discussing the iplayer issue they always state HLG for BROADCAST was added to the TV as promised, and won't be made compatible through iplayer.
I know its a play on words but would the live rugby shown on Saturday on Iplayer 4K HLG be broadcast as it's live, bit like the world cup if that's also shown on Iplayer?
It's largely semantics of course, but if it was me I would call it a "live stream".
With broadcasting, when we talk about "live" we all accept a delay of a few seconds while the signal bounces up to a satellite and back down, and through the network to our screens. Also the Digital TV era adds a few seconds of encoding delay on top of that, plus decoding delay at the TV end. So a "live" broadcast now will easily be 2-3 seconds behind a "live" broadcast in the analogue age. You can hear this every day if you compare the imposter digital pips on Radio 4 DAB to the real ones on FM.
With internet streaming, as opposed to proper broadcasting, people accept there is a much, much bigger delay. With Sky's live streams of F1 for example they are easily 30 seconds to a minute behind the proper broadcast. However, to make things simpler we all still tend to call them "live" streams. YouTubers do, for example. It's just quicker and easier than saying "live but could be up to 2 minutes behind real time".